We enter 2017 with a new President, a polarized electorate, an incomplete Supreme Court, and an increasingly isolated California. Against this dramatic backdrop, Glen Kraemer will examine the most important recent appellate decisions and legislation in the equal employment opportunity arena, while forecasting discrimination law trends that could dramatically impact our State in the new…
Read More ›Steve Hirschfeld and Amy Durgan will be presenting the latest information employers need to know about managing risk from hiring to firing, including: Hiring process including criminal background checks, candidate Internet searches, do’s and don’ts in interviews, offer letters and hiring documents Performance management and discipline for attendance, attitude, misconduct, and work performance Rightful termination…
Read More ›
As discussed in previous blog posts, on May 6, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) announced a package of sweeping changes to Title IX (the Final Rule), scheduled to take effect August 14, 2020. Since that announcement, the Final Rule has faced significant criticism, including the following statement by American Council on Education President…
Read More ›
Top 10 Developments of 2018 in Employment and Higher Education Law: NUMBER 10 – HIGHER ED ROUNDUP 2018 was a year full of legislative action at the federal level. In the higher education sphere, proposed changes to Title IX dominated the news cycles, while changes at the Supreme Court might herald the demise of “affirmative…
Read More ›The California Supreme Court refused to decide whether the “honest belief” defense to discrimination and retaliation claims is valid under California law. Instead, in Richey v. Autonation, Inc., the Court punted on the decision and found that an arbitrator’s underlying decision was based on “overwhelming” evidence of an employee’s misconduct and that the arbitrator’s application…
Read More ›After reading the Ted Wells investigation report of the Richie Incognito and Jonathan Martin matter, I had several reactions. Most focused on Incognito’s reprehensible and vile bullying of Martin, primarily aided by his two teammates, Mike Pouncey and John Jerry. After reflecting on the workplace environment that allowed such repeated atrocious conduct to occur, I…
Read More ›As an employment law attorney, I regularly advise employers on personnel issues, including the conduct of internal investigations into employee complaints. Colleagues at my firm have a similar practice. We review investigation summaries and counsel human resources professionals in the conduct of investigations into internal complaints, including those involving discrimination, harassment and retaliation. I thought…
Read More ›For the first time since January 2012, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) unquestionably has a quorum to issue rulings. This comes on the heels of the U.S. Senate’s votes yesterday to confirm a 5 members of the Board, three of whom are labor-friendly and two of whom have a management background. They are: Mark Gaston…
Read More ›Confidentiality is the hallmark to any meaningful attempt to investigate workplace misconduct. Not only for the alleged victim of harassment or discrimination, but for the alleged perpetrator too. Apparently, the National Labor Relations Board does not agree with that time-honored maxim, as it continues its assault on confidentiality in workplace investigations. Last year, in Banner…
Read More ›The California Supreme Court has agreed to review a lower court’s decision which prohibited the so-called “honest belief” defense used by California employers in response to claims under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA). The high court’s review is notable because California courts have permitted employers to assert the “honest belief” defense in discrimination cases…
Read More ›
